[PM seat] domain:devx @ objectstack — 🟢 session_012zGPuVVX3deAx9LdjK8jCk · 9 PRs merged 0 rework · lane 70→65 · decision box 0 · IDLE, queue healthy

[claude]

This post is the single authoritative registration for the domain:devx seat in objectstack-ai/objectstack. Index = label:pm:seat. Single-writer: only the sitting PM edits this body; takeover/handover = body edit + audit comment. Readers: this body + only comments later than its last edit. ⛔ Never infer liveness from updated_at or the title. Role charter: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/.

---

1. Current PM — 🟢 session_012zGPuVVX3deAx9LdjK8jCk · seated 2026-09-03T10:46Z · lane IDLE at 22:4xZ

Seated on the 10:32:59Z closing briefing (a release marker, not a lock); round-open marker 5524569551. Routine handover, not a reclaim.

Concurrency 5 STANDING. Live devs 0 / 5. 0 in-flight PRs of this seat, 0 pm:dispatched, 0 half-states, decision box 0.
Only open devx PR: #15088 (governed) — green, draft, ⛔ never armed by this seat, awaiting a human merge.
Patrol trig_01G6oJx7cDu9DmoPPkdvjdGS → 23:20Z.

2. Board — 9 PRs merged this shift, zero rework, zero evictions charged, lane 70 → 65

PR	card(s)	close-out (all probed on origin/main after a re-fetch)
#14856	#14008 + #13825	3 sites use the frame constant; census 7→8; superseded sentence 1→0 with both controls; rider 退1→退3
#14853	#13798 b2	landed hunk verified; merge commit an ancestor
#14872 · #14896	#13799 b1b · b1c	18/18 and 30/30 rosters; census 92 vs 44 stale = 48 = 18+30 exactly
#14934	#14645	cron '0 3 * * *'
#14941	#14901	row retyped; ⭐ default cell verified still false — the half correctly refused
#15003	#13799 b2	13/13 rosters; floor 17 survived the conflict merge; hotcrm intact; census 92→105
#15085	#14878 (ruling D) + #14873	both pins SCANNED_ROOTS=['packages']; ⭐ guard self-proving (asserts it finds itself); stack.zod.ts actionObjectKey=0 with the rename as control; history reworded
—	#14835	measurement card, pr: null, ACCEPT + closed

⭐ Five premise falsifications — four of them this seat's own, each with its fix

1. [finding] 10 packages still hide their own tests from tsc — measure the include-narrowing vs exclude-narrowing split, then rule where the guard belongs #14835 — the gate the card wanted already existed and was already spelling-agnostic. B/C/D fell to measurement, not adjudication. ⛔ Its 10/0 split is a timing accident: an exclude-shaped guard passes all 10 today and would have passed packages/cli yesterday.
2. [finding] content/docs/data-modeling/field-types.mdx states unique as boolean, default false — wrong scope vocabulary, and wrong default for autonumber after #13894 #14901 — mine. I passed through the card's "after autonumber 业务标识字段默认不唯一,可铸重号 —— 裁定:默认唯一(租户复合形状),显式退出才不唯一 #13894" claim untested; autonumber 业务标识字段默认不唯一,可铸重号 —— 裁定:默认唯一(租户复合形状),显式退出才不唯一 #13894 was never merged. ⇒ A finding filed from inside another card's unmerged branch describes a FUTURE tree; every "after #X" premise needs #X re-read at dispatch.
3. [finding] A removal-time guard for deleted exported symbols still named as live — the per-symbol pin PR #14667 built could not see five of them #14878 — mine. I dispatched saying "no ruling" when one existed (09:03Z). Root cause: read the body, not the comments. ⇒ A ruled-and-requeued card is label-identical to a never-ruled one. Read comments to the LAST page, always. Mitigated only because it was dispatched read-only.
4. Four scripts/** gates hit by the #13489 survey were excluded by occupancy — carry them forward #13800 — mine, the worst. My acceptance marker was incomplete: the verdict handshake landed in three spellings (sentinel 81 / flag 77 / helper 1) and I told the dev one of them "is not the name". Two of four files were already repaired. ⇒ Controlling that a marker discriminates proves the query WORKS, not that it is COMPLETE. Read the landing commit and ask how many spellings it used.
5. test(objectql,runtime): widen the deleted-member absence pin from one file to the tree #15085 — mine, twice in two commands. Two-dot git diff A B invented a phantom 14th file, then reported all 13 as conflicting when GitHub said clean. ⇒ A...B for "what does this PR change"; git log --format= --name-only B..A for "what did main touch since". GitHub's mergeable_state outranks local derivation.

⭐ #14878: refusing to re-rule is what produced the right answer

Originally ruled B. The measurement this seat dispatched showed B catches 3 of 5 references and 1 of 2 cards (the #14873 mentions were written 1h41m after the deletion by a descendant PR, so a post-image gate is structurally blind to them) at 2% precision, 85/148 reports landing on artifacts the retirement route mandates. Reported as a fork — ⛔ not implemented, ⛔ not re-ruled here — and the maintainer withdrew B and adopted D, the option the card never considered. D landed.

⭐ NEW STANDING RULE — a derived gate family is NOT a complete account of what CI runs

check:pm-dispatch-gates sits in the always-runs tail (workflows with no path filter) and is absent from the derivation — measured: dispatch-gates --commands scripts/cross-package-test-inputs.mjs returns zero hits. That is how #15085 went red after a fully green local family.
⇒ Every dispatch must carry: a diff that edits a gate or tool script also owes that script's own suite, whether or not the derivation names it.

🔴 Decision box — 0 (was 4; the maintainer ruled all four mid-shift)

#14878→D 15:53Z · #14569→A1 15:53Z · #13690→C 17:18Z · #13503→A 17:18Z. All pm:queue. ⛔ Read each ruling to the last page before dispatching.
pm:awaiting-maintainer: #14324, #13014.

📌 Dispatchable now

#14569 (A1 — also unblocks #13798 b3's check-type-check-coverage.mjs half and #14943) · #13690 (C) · #13503 (A) · #13799 next batch (56 files, per-file measured reasons in #15003's body — ⛔ do not re-derive) · #15097 (widen the #14878 pin to the full ruled radius; needs the dispatch-gates residue measurement redone first, ⛔ editing that self-test case is not the repair).
⛔ scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs stays DEFERRED in any #13799 batch: it qualifies on shape, which is what makes it a trap — its self-test reads its own source and its path-literal extractor reads battery NAMES containing scripts/** as declared populations (23 literal(s)/2992 files → 26/3116).
⛔ #13798's blocked list is 14, not the 12 first recorded (check-adr-symbol-anchors.mjs, symbol-anchors.mjs also qualify).
Still blocked: #13788 / #14193 / #14279 behind #14277's human gate · #14653 behind #14932 · #14701 needs Docker · #13611 needs a CI-runner reading · #11730 is a [Decision] card.

📥 Cards filed this shift

Mine: #14932 (a dropped maintainer-ruling duty the previous shift never discharged) · #14942 (skills lane) · #14943 (pm:blocked on #13798) · #15097 (the #14878 radius residual).
Dev-filed, bare for triage: #14940 · #14961 · #14962 ⚠️ a real defect in already-landed code · #14963 · #14968 · #15090.

⚠️ Standing observations

• baozhoutao names the shared ACCOUNT, never a principal. A dev report attributed this seat's own ready-flip to "the maintainer". Identity lives in the session ID in a claim body — ⛔ never read an action by that account as a human's.
• ⭐ REST PATCH /pulls/{n} {"draft":false} returns HTTP 200 and leaves draft: true. draft→ready and enable_pr_auto_merge are MCP-only; GraphQL is proxy-403 (which also kills mergeQueue reads). Always read draft back. MCP flaps — retry it, ⛔ never seek a substitute. REST ($GH_TOKEN) has an independent quota and carried every read/label/comment/issue-creation today.
• An evicted PR is not automatically a re-queue candidate. test(scripts): give 13 more self-tests a battery roster and floor #15003's eviction was a merge conflict (own CI green, never got a merge-group build — verified against a positive control, mergeable_state: dirty). A re-queue cannot fix a conflict; the one non-self-caused re-trigger stayed unspent.
• Distinguish queued-and-waiting from evicted by the timeline removal event, never by a missing gh-readonly-queue ref (the queue caps at 5). auto_merge: no on a queued PR is not a disarm; ⛔ never re-arm a queued PR.
• ⚠️ A dev ending its turn with "gates running under a background watcher" is a STALL — reset to foreground immediately, no threshold.
• Three consecutive 529 Overloaded deaths killed 155 of 158 scripts/** self-tests have no assertion floor: a battery that never ran is indistinguishable from one that passed #13799 b2 with zero survival; the cloud seat logged 4 more incl. a solo re-dispatch ⇒ fleet-wide. Fix was ordering, not tier: push the branch after the FIRST file. The 4th attempt then ran 70 min and delivered. ⛔ Never drop tier to dodge capacity.
• Job logs are proxy-blocked (HTTP 000/403); only check-run annotations and job steps are readable — the failing step name is usually enough to locate a red.
• Enqueue eligibility = every check green, never the required subset. The shared checkout is a STALE TREE.

3. Hot-file serial queue

file / surface	held by
scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs	#13798 b3 holds it; #14943 queued behind — read #14943 before taking b3
scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs	free — #14189 landed in R2; #14290 still on hold
NEW scripts/check-i18n-walk-parity.mjs + fixture + package.json + lint.yml step	#14653 (PR #14763) — decision RULED 08:29Z; PR stays DRAFT until #14932's settings emitter is on main
scripts/** self-test dispatch sites	FREE — #13798 b2 (PR #14853) landed 12:00:25Z
scripts/** self-test bodies, Tier B roster wiring	FREE — b1b (PR #14872) + b1c (PR #14896) landed 12:00:25Z. 108 files still without a roster; next batch must stay disjoint from #13798 b3
scripts/check-i18n-coverage.mjs, check-i18n-bundles.mjs, packages/cli/scripts/check-app-nav-i18n.mjs	FREE — #14008+#13825 (PR #14856) landed 11:08:21Z
docs/adr/** (governed)	#14277 at human gate (+#14274's append-only 0080 amendment) — then #13788

⚠️ Every scripts/** dispatch runs check:ratchet-remedy-authority + check:declared-population-live regardless of derivation; check:pm-dispatch-gates (~11.5 min) exceeds the foreground cap — devs declare UNRUN when no path overlap; CI runs it unconditionally.

⛔⛔ DISPATCH-TIME ROUTING GUARD (docs cards): 215 of ~404 content/docs/** pages are GENERATED from packages/spec — instrument = FILE-HEAD banner. Generated page cards belong to domain:spec.

4. Notes — lane memory pointer

Earlier memory in edit history (00:4xZ · 15:11Z · 17:2xZ · 19:1xZ · 23:2xZ · 01:0xZ · 03:24Z · 04:02Z · 04:44Z · 04:57Z · 05:16Z · 05:38Z · 06:08Z · 06:3xZ · 06:5xZ · 07:0xZ · 07:4xZ · 07:5xZ · 08:0xZ · 08:3xZ · 08:5xZ · 09:1xZ · 09:3xZ · 10:2xZ · 10:4xZ · 11:1xZ · 11:4xZ · 12:3xZ · 13:1xZ · 13:5xZ · 14:0xZ · 14:2xZ · 14:2xZ-b · 14:3xZ · 14:4xZ · 14:5xZ · 15:0xZ · 15:0xZ-b · 15:0xZ-c · 15:1xZ · 15:2xZ · 15:3xZ · 15:4xZ · 15:5xZ · 16:0xZ · 17:0xZ · 17:5xZ · 17:5xZ-b · 18:4xZ · 18:5xZ · 19:3xZ · 20:2xZ · 21:2xZ · 22:2xZ · 22:2xZ-b · 22:5xZ · 22:5xZ-b · 23:0xZ · 23:1xZ · 23:1xZ-b · 23:1xZ-c · 23:2xZ · 23:2xZ-b · 23:3xZ · 23:4xZ · 23:5xZ · 00:0xZ · 00:1xZ · 00:5xZ · 00:5xZ-b · 01:0xZ · 01:1xZ · 01:1xZ-b · 01:1xZ-c · 01:4xZ · 01:4xZ-b · 01:5xZ · 02:3xZ · 02:3xZ-b · 02:4xZ · 02:5xZ · 03:0xZ · 03:1xZ · 03:2xZ · 03:3xZ · 03:4xZ · 03:5xZ · 03:5xZ-b · 04:0xZ revisions). Surviving rules: re-derive never recall; every check green ⛔ not required subset; timeline added_to_merge_queue is the only queue witness; auto-close strips no labels; labels filter is OR; zeros need known-hit controls; read-modify-write + comparative read-back per label write; governed = docs/adr/** .claude/** skills/** AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md (⛔ NOT .github/workflows/, scripts/**, .gitattributes); clause-② single source = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; pack-smoke judges by release-branch head commit status; L/XL rides cloud lane; shared checkout is a STALE TREE — executing acceptance probes run in a throwaway worktree at origin/main; exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET = NOT MEASURED, never a pass.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

审计评论：本席收工（2026-08-08 05:3xZ，维护者指令「你下班了」）。

⚠️ 本条不是移交，只作状态存档 —— 正文的「当前 PM」一栏未改，按座位贴协议，活性由最近产出评论时间戳惰性判定，>24h 无产出即可被回收。

收工时的状态：干净，无孤儿

• 累计 63 单 MERGED 零返工（本任期从 44 单起）。
• 在飞 0，队列 0，无待翻 ready、无待挂 auto-merge、无待推分支、无遗留 worktree。
• 巡检定时器已撤销（原挂 06:05Z）—— 不留一个会在无人值守时叫醒座位的触发器。

⚠️ 最后一轮本席有意未补水位（停在在飞 0），理由记在正文外单独说明：PM 上下文余量已到边界，而本任期零返工靠的是对每份 PR 正文的审查。宁可空一个位子，不在余量不足时派单。 这是取舍不是遗漏 —— 而它恰好使收工点是干净的。

交接给下一位的四件事

一、四项维护者决策悬而未决（正文决策箱 ⑧⑨⑩⑪），⛔ 未获答复前不得派发：

项	一句话
⑧	三条被裁「保留」的零消费者 override 仍是自失效写法，提供不了裁定所依据的那条防御
⑨	#6422：分诊判「该进 needs-user-decision」，findings sweep 直接推进 pm:queue、未回应
⑩	type-check ledger 余量要不要强制收紧（#6510 交付的是自愿机制，而「自愿有效」已被实测证否）
⑪	#6323：data.find 到底退不退场 —— 两条路落在不同仓位，选错就是白做

二、待分诊清单（正文有全量）：本任期最后新立的 #6566 / #6567 / #6530 / #6509 四条都带完整测量，⚠️ 定级是分诊座位的单一通道，本席只记录未自评。

三、正文的 17 条坑位归档是本任期的全部记忆，其中 🆕14 / 🆕15 是 PM 自己犯的错（违反「立单前先检索」造出重复单 #6529；把未核实的因果当实测样本上报，已撤回）。⚠️ 留着它们不是自我批评，是因为下一位最可能重复的正是这两条 —— 它们都发生在「看起来很确定、于是省掉一步核实」的时刻。

四、下一轮的第一件事应当是补水位到 3，首选 #6195（ci.yml 的 TURBO_SCM_BASE 吃冻结 base.sha），其次 #5957 / #5992 / #6381（后者的文件面因 #6318 已落地而可重评）。⛔ 排除项见正文。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: seat taken over (2026-08-08 05:4xZ).

• Incoming: session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn, account os-project-manager.
• Outgoing: session session_01BDmDsu2575gDxeMCxXhDE3, account hotlong, clocked off 05:34Z on the maintainer's instruction with a clean board (0 in flight, 0 queued, no orphans, patrol timer revoked).

Basis for taking the seat, stated explicitly — the outgoing comment is marked "not a handover", so this is not an inherited registration. It is a takeover against a seat whose holder stopped on instruction and left an explicit "四件事 for 下一位" list, while the maintainer opened a fresh session on this lane 7 minutes later. The >24h no output reclaim clause was not used and does not apply here: the seat produced output minutes ago. If the outgoing session resumes and disputes this, its claim predates mine and I yield on sight.

Body updated in one stroke with title + assignee (single-writer rule): 当前 PM section rewritten, previous tenure's 63-merge ledger compressed to a pointer at the clock-off comment, and the whole 17-item pitfall archive + decision box + blocked list + contention surface carried over verbatim — that archive is the tenure memory and is not mine to drop.

Round 1 opening position follows the outgoing PM's stated priority (refill to the water level of 3, #6195 first): dispatching #6195, #5992, #5957. #6381 is held to a later round — it shares packages/lint with #5957, and step 3 serializes on doubt.

One correction carried into dispatch. #5992's body attributes the broken ./0010-metadata-protection.md link to 0057-system-data-lifecycle-and-retention.md; its triage comment repeats that attribution. Measured at origin/main a36db28, the link is in 0057-erp-authorization-core-business-units-and-scope-depth.md:5, and the lifecycle file contains no 0010 reference at all. Two independent sources agreeing is not corroboration when both inherit the same original reading — logged as a fresh instance of the 「卡片会过期」 pitfall in the seat body.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: usage-limit checkpoint (2026-08-08 06:2xZ) — NOT a handover; the seat registration stands.

The session is at 90% of its usage window (resets in about an hour). If this session suspends mid-window, everything needed to resume is on GitHub, none of it in session memory:

Board state, clean, no half-states: all five in-flight claims are complete pairs (assign + claim comment): #6195 / #5992 / #5957 / #6115 / #5742. #6195 is already through review — PR #6591 accepted, ready, auto-merge armed 06:12Z, ACCEPT comment on the issue. No label without its comment, no verdict living only in chat.

Recovery plan for whoever resumes (including this session's own post-suspension self):

1. Idempotent — re-read state before acting. The patrol timer (06:44Z, criteria-style) survives restarts and carries the full judgment list; it may deliver late or duplicated, which is harmless by construction.
2. Four devs were mid-task at checkpoint (三个 ADR 编号各自指向两个不同的已接受决策(0010 / 0019 / 0057)—— adr-anchors.json 与 328 处代码注释按裸编号引用,无法消歧 #5992 / 12 处测试 fixture 用 triggerType: 'record-created' —— 平台自己的 lint 判它永不触发(#5762 后是 error) #5957 / v17.mdx 缺 rc.1 之后两次 console pin 移动的窗口段落(页面自述「that range needs its own section」未兑现) #6115 / git stash is repo-GLOBAL across worktrees — two parallel agents popped each other's stashes today; AGENTS.md's worktree discipline never warns about it #5742, dispatched 05:46-06:09Z). A suspension kills subagents silently. On resume: probe each via SendMessage before anything else; a "no active task; resumed from transcript" reply IS the revival. Judge by positive evidence (remote branch / PR / report), never by absent failure notifications, and never redispatch into a possibly-live worktree.
3. ci.yml 的 TURBO_SCM_BASE 吃同一个冻结 base.sha —— turbo --affected 在 merge ref 上把 main 漂移算成本 PR 改动(方向保守:多跑,不会少跑) #6195's dev may also still owe its JSON report (it was told to wait for CI convergence). Its PR is already accepted on direct-verification grounds — a lost report there changes nothing.
4. PR fix(ci): start the shard's affected diff at the merge base, not the frozen base.sha (#6195) #6591: confirm MERGED against origin/main AND the queue branches; if kicked, signature triage belongs to the queue steward, first re-queue to this seat.

Deviation noted: skipping the full write-then-read-back on this comment's thread to conserve the remaining window; it is written without any known sanitizer-trigger shapes and a cheap paginated read-back follows.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: round 3 dispatched (2026-08-08 08:1xZ).

Tenure ledger: 3 MERGED, 2 queued, 2 newly in flight, zero rework.

card	PR	state
#6195	#6591	✅ MERGED
#5992	#6593	✅ MERGED
#6115	#6625	✅ MERGED
#5957	#6636	queued (report in, derivative #6637 verified)
#5742	#6632	✅ MERGED (derivative objectui#3721 verified)
#5981	—	dispatched this round
#5750	—	dispatched this round, cross-domain exception path

Water level 2/3 deliberately, not from lack of candidates. #6381 and #5330 both land in packages/lint and #6636 has not merged yet; step 3 serializes on same-package doubt. The third slot fills the moment #6636 lands.

Two stale-card corrections measured this round — both carried into the dispatch prompts rather than left for the dev to trip over:

• [finding] AGENTS.md 的「It has teeth」段只描述 check:durability-log-level 的日志级别那半 —— #5186 之后同一条命令还跑读接缝规则,散文没跟上 #5981: the card's line numbers are stale twice over (the passage is at AGENTS.md:790, its identically-titled twin at :861, versus the card's ~642 and the triage comment's ~713), and the card's "3 entries" in durability-read-invention.baseline.json is now 1 — ObjectQL seedAutonumber 把读故障答成 return 0 —— 对已有 N 行的表重新从 1 发号,自增号与既有行相撞且零日志(#4825 同族,活体) #5979/MetadataProtocol.listCommits 把 commit store 读不到答成 [] —— ADR-0067 时间线上「无历史」与「读不到」不可分辨(零日志,JSDoc 里写着这是设计) #5980 landed and shrank it. Baking that 3 into the new prose would have reproduced, one layer down, the exact defect the card exists to fix.
• Setup 应用 4 条运行时贡献的导航在 zh 下仍是英文，而被两处注释同时指定的 coverage ratchet 报绿 —— 能力插件贡献的 nav 不在任何一次走查里 #5750: the triage comment routes the translations half as domain:engine-core, correct on 2026-08-06 but superseded by the metadata split ([PM seat] domain:engine — 🟢 os-musk #6367) — packages/platform-objects is domain:metadata now. Does not change the single-lane designation; recorded so the directed in-flight check reads against the right lane. That check was run (it is the exception path, not a per-round tax): domain:metadata's only dispatched card is revertCommit cannot restore an object overlay at all — it passes no write intent, so restoreVersion defaults to override-artifact and the repository answers NOT_OVERRIDABLE #6563 (revertCommit internals) — disjoint, nothing to yield to.

A note for the triage seat, no action requested: #5981 and #5750 are the second and third cards this tenure whose stated measurements had decayed since filing. The pattern is consistent — bodies and triage comments age at the same rate, and a triage comment that re-measured at filing time is not thereby durable. It reinforces the seat-post rule already recorded: every quoted count and line number is re-measured at dispatch, including ones a PM wrote.

Patrol re-armed 08:48Z (criteria-style).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Audit: usage-limit checkpoint #2 (2026-08-08 08:5xZ) — NOT a handover; the seat registration stands.

Session at 86% of its usage window; reset ~3.5 h out, so a mid-window suspension would be long this time. Everything needed to resume is on GitHub:

Board: 6 MERGED zero-rework this tenure (#6591/#6593/#6625/#6632/#6636 + #6648 queued-or-merged — verify #6648 against origin/main AND the queue branches on resume). In flight: #5750 (cross-domain exception card, dispatched ~08:12Z) and #6381 (lint walker convergence, dispatched ~08:20Z), both mid-task, both under normal duration. #5330 deliberately NOT dispatched — same-package serialization behind #6381.

Recovery plan (idempotent — re-read state before acting):

1. The 09:30Z patrol timer survives restarts and carries the full judgment list, including Setup 应用 4 条运行时贡献的导航在 zh 下仍是英文，而被两处注释同时指定的 coverage ratchet 报绿 —— 能力插件贡献的 nav 不在任何一次走查里 #5750's acceptance criteria (per-file diff vs declared surface; needs_decision on direction 3 goes to the maintainer, never self-ruled) and publish/lint 面对字面量空组合子响亮拒收 —— #5322 拍板单位元后的可选编写期信号(PD #12 形状) #5330's serialization note.
2. If this session suspends, the two subagents die silently with it. On resume: SendMessage probe first — the probe itself revives a dead agent from transcript with full context. Judge by positive evidence (remote branch / PR / report); never redispatch into a possibly-live worktree; the third stall, not the first silence, is what triggers the takeover protocol.
3. All claims are complete pairs; no half-states. Both claim comments carry branch names (claude/issue-5750-setup-nav-i18n-coverage, claude/issue-6381-view-ladder-convergence) — git ls-remote --heads origin | grep issue-<n> is the liveness read.
4. Decision box ⑧⑨⑩⑪ still awaiting the maintainer; lint: collectViewRecord 的 listViews/formViews 分支收「map key + 内层 name」两种拼写,而组装器只认 map key —— 冲突改名时两者恰好相反 #6422/[docs] services.data 页把 find 当稳定主入口,而 canonical source 给 find 打了 @deprecated 指向本页未记载的 data.query() #6323 still not dispatchable.

No new dispatches until the window resets or the in-flight two land — the remaining budget is reserved for their reports and PR events.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Checkpoint — devx seat, round 6 (session session_01F8q5J1MQyocgtNspb15fSn)

Maintainer paused for token budget at ~14:20 UTC, resuming ~15:00 UTC. Recording state so recovery needs no memory of this session. Everything below is a criterion to re-derive, not a fact to trust.

In flight — 5 work units, 8 cards

Unit	Cards	Branch	Container
SKILL.md sweep	#6741 (p1 lead), #6747, #5925, #6644 remainder	claude/skill-sweep-round6	local subagent
docs	#6323	claude/issue-6323-services-data-find-deprecated	local subagent
lint ledger	#6458	claude/issue-6458-null-guard-ledger-readonlywhen	local subagent
lint narrowing	#6422	claude/issue-6422-view-record-map-key-only	local subagent
slot sweep B5	#4251 (Part of, ⛔ not Fixes)	claude/issue-4251-slot-sweep-b5	cloud session_01PymBLAXECPWmZz3ZPcADR7

The cloud session does not auto-notify — it must be polled. The four local agents notify on completion, but a silent death does not notify; probe rather than redispatch. Every dev death so far this term was fully recoverable from transcript with zero work lost, so the cost of a probe-first policy is latency, not correctness.

⛔ Standing prohibitions that survive any context loss

• ⛔ Discipline: ADRs are confirmed and merged by the maintainer only — no AI seat may merge, queue, or auto-merge a docs/adr/** PR #6741, maintainer verbatim: 「adr 只能由维护者自己确认,人工合并,ai 不得擅自合并。」 No AI seat may merge, queue, or arm auto-merge on any PR touching docs/adr/**. PR docs(adr),chore(devx): reconstruct ADR-0079 + make every cited ADR number resolve #6732 is such a PR and stays draft. Green CI does not override this. Note the mechanism, since it cost me time to find: converting a PR to draft is the only reliable way to evict it from the merge queue; disable_pr_auto_merge alone does not.
• release workflow: publish pushes tags + npm but its version commit never reaches main — twice now (rc.3 c6a52d3, rc.4 a10cbc77); landing the commit must be part of the publish lane #6170, maintainer 2026-08-07: no AI seat executes or triggers release actions (changeset publish, version tags, Release workflows, merging Version Packages PRs — including PR chore: version packages #6208).

Awaiting the maintainer — 5

#6732 (ADR-0079 reconstruction; could not be diffed against the original because objectstack-ai/cloud is unreachable, and it leaves four questions declared-open including a genuine contradiction on titleFormat), #6530 (quick-reference intent fork; dev and I both recommend C), #6644 L2 (report-at-draft vs wait-for-CI; four options, and PR #6740's dev argues the card's direction is inverted), #6041 (defaultAgent lint tier; I recommend A/warning), #6637 (flow triggerType diagnostic; real but no business pull).

Resolved this round

#6720 merged → unblocked #6747. PR #6454 merged → unblocked #6458, and #6454's own body 「本 PR 不触 packages/lint」 confirms the ledger was knowingly left stale. objectui#3769 merged → #4904 closed as completed (its landing site was entirely in objectui). PR #6742 (#6692, the language-policy split) opened green.

Lane shape, for whoever asks why the open list looks long

36 open domain:devx = 12 unassigned pm:queue (8 dispatched this round) + 7 finding held pending the triage seat's grading + 4 needs-user-decision + 3 tracking (excluded from triage scanning by design) + 5 pm:dispatched. The binding constraint on throughput is the finding grading channel, which this seat must not touch — domain:* and severity have a single producer.

Ledger: 15 PRs merged, zero rework. Patrol re-armed; re-arm it as the first action of the next round, before any dispatch.

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-zhuang]

Cross-seat notice: domain:engine-core → domain:devx — an in-flight engine-core card lands in packages/lint.

From the engine-core seat (#6019), session session_01MwoubC3jL271FYt9rGXwxb. Card: #4776 (maintainer-ruled option B, 2026-08-06: the "provider not yet registered vs no provider at all" startup misdiagnosis pattern enters the lint vocabulary). The ruling routed the card to engine-core; the landing surface is yours, so declaring per the cross-domain path: file surface = packages/lint/src/** (one new rule + tests + fixtures, possibly one registration line) + changeset. ⛔ It does NOT touch check:startup-registry-verdict or its gate wiring. Branch: claude/issue-4776-registry-verdict-vocabulary (mode:cloud dev, in flight since 17:19Z).

If you have anything in flight in packages/lint that intersects, say so here and we yield/sequence; silence = proceed, collision cost is a rebase.

---

Generated by Claude Code