Skip to content

[PM seat] domain:engine — 🟢 os-musk #6367

Description

@hotlong

⚠️ This post is the RECORD of state, not the state. Every round, re-read the labels. Never read the counts here as current.

📌 Job description is versioned at .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/engine.md. ⛔ Not hand-copied per term.

1. Current PM — 🟢 os-musk

session session_0112hMx9hjJ9BgB28X97DS68 · GitHub login os-musk · seated 2026-09-02T01:45Z via /pm-dispatch engine on 「前任已经在收尾跟进合并,你直接接班。」 · round R16 (opened 2026-09-03T18:0xZ).

Maintainer, most recent first: 17:0xZ 「14923 直接作废」, preceded by 「14923 暂停合并 / 交维护者处理」 ⇒ both executed, see §2. Earlier this shift: 09:2xZ 「任务很多,并发保持5」 ⇒ hard ceiling is 5, superseding 「后续并发降到4」; 「14926 红了,其他除了14923 我都点了merge」; 「pr都绿啦」; 「已完成的pr为什么不合并」.

⛔⛔ THIS SEAT IS OFF CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER

Tier is claude-fable-5-1 (scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:7955). get_session reads session_context.model and last_served_model both claude-opus-5. ⇒ ⛔ No Clause-② PR may be reviewed in-seat; each goes to an isolated subagent explicitly passed model: fable, fed only card + rulings + PR, adopted verbatim or voided whole. ⛔ Re-read the fuse with get_session every review session.

⚠️ The tier was quota-exhausted through every attempt this shift. That is why #13636's PR carried an unsatisfied needs:contract-review to its end: the gate was unmet by absence of a review, not by a failed one. ⛔ Those are different states and the label cannot tell them apart — write which one it is, every time.

⭐⭐ SEAT ERROR, corrected this shift — I framed a settled question as open in a review brief

For PR #15008 (#14038) I asked the reviewer to judge "local helper vs shared canonicalIsoInstant" as an open design question. Triage had already ruled it — comment 5487875301 rules option 1 and names the route verbatim: 「与 #13997 走的、以及 #14037 将走的是同一条路」. Same shape as the #14486 error (telling a dev something was "genuinely open" that a ruling had settled).

It did no damage, and the reason is reusable: the same brief said "read the card and every comment first, quote any ruling verbatim, ⛔ do not accept the PR body's paraphrase as evidence." That instruction outranked my framing and the reviewer found the ruling. Route the agent to the source and your own framing stops being load-bearing. The brief also missed a binding constraint I did not know existed (⛔ 「PR说明里不要把这次修复写成「行为变更」」) — the reviewer found and checked it for the same reason.

⛔ Earlier this shift: I read merge-queue membership off the wrong instrument, and reported it

Called enable_pr_auto_merge on five PRs, saw (method: , enabled at ) with empty fields, found no auto_merge field, concluded the arms failed, told the maintainer. Wrong#14629 and #14649 were in the queue the whole time and landed.

⭐⭐ Sharpened this shift with the other half of the reading: a filled-in confirmation — (method: MERGE, enabled at 2026-09-03T17:51:28Z) — is the positive arm reading, observed on #14926, #14982 and #15008. The empty sentence corresponds to already queued. So the sentence does carry information; it just does not mean what it looks like. ⛔ The absent auto_merge field still supports no conclusion in either direction, and the reliable membership reading is still actions_list + event: merge_group.

⛔ PR #14734 merged while FAILed — recorded, not reverted

Tier review FAILed it, card was pm:blocked, zero reviews existed, this seat never armed it. Six disable_pr_auto_merge attempts all hit the GraphQL rate limit. Merged as dee4dd4ba. ⛔ Not reverted (pre-registered rule). The still-unreleased false changeset claim is flagged on release PR #11336.

2. Ledger (current values, 2026-09-03T18:0xZ)

origin/main = 99b4deba4.

Landed and verified by content this shift — most recent first

card PR commit verified by
#14415 #14982 95464ed65 test file present on origin/main; this.runMutationProjector( = 7 call sites
#14587 #14926 9f57f1e31 all five corrected zh-CN leaves present, 5 of 5
#14213 #14629 13b520069
#14527 #14649 82252480a
#14914 ca3fd4b1a

⛔ Every one read off origin/main by content, ⛔ never off the API's merged field.

In the merge queue — 1

#14038 / PR #15008 — ready 17:5xZ, armed (method: MERGE, enabled at 17:51:28Z), all 37 check runs green/skipped. Independent review PASS.

In flight — 3 of 5

target card surface
os-dev #13609 p2 bug protocol.tsapplyRemoteMetadataMutation receipt path (~:5062-5199) + a helper beside readWriteEpoch in meta-overlay-cache.ts
os-dev #14989 (fix round) docs/audits/** + scripts/qa/** — three citation corrections, review FAILed it
reviewer #15033 (#14423 step 1) census PR, read-only across the tree

Decision box / handed over

Filed this shift, unassigned and ungraded (⛔ domain:*/priority/type are triage's)

#14998plugin-auth durability-swallow-repair.test.ts:673 pays a cold dynamic import inside a 10 s testTimeout; reddened an unrelated PR. Six closed same-family precedents; #5421 and #3662 are the same sibling-already-sets-a-longer-timeout shape.
#15037RemoteLoader.list() declares Promise<string[]> but maps a nameless body straight through, so listNames() can return a literal undefined. Filed on behalf of the #14423 census seat, which correctly declined to file blind when its dedup channel hit the rate limit.

Closed and residue-cleaned this shift

#14415 (Fixes-closed by #14982) — all pm:* stripped, assignee cleared, verified by comparison read-back. #14587 — closed completed after verifying #14931 really carries its part 2; same strip, same read-back.

3. Hot-file serial queue (2026-09-03T18:0xZ)

⭐⭐ READ THIS BEFORE THE CLAIM, NOT AFTER. Reversing that order burned #14623.

4. Notes

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

domain:enginepm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions